Benefit does not appear immediately. Pooled trial data found no significant difference from control at 4 weeks, with improvement in erectile function scores at 12 and 24 weeks. Beyond 24 weeks the published follow-up is limited.
A 2025 systematic review pooling seven randomized controlled trials across 660 patients measured erectile function scores at set intervals. The pattern was consistent:
| Timepoint | Result vs control |
|---|---|
| 4 weeks | No significant difference |
| 12 weeks | Significant improvement |
| 24 weeks | Significant improvement |
Two things follow from this. First, if you feel nothing at four weeks, that is expected — the trials found no measurable difference at that point either. Second, benefit appears to build rather than fade over the first six months.
Honestly: the published evidence thins considerably. Most trials did not follow patients much beyond six months, so statements about duration past that point are extrapolation rather than measurement.
Clinics commonly quote 12 to 18 months. That figure is not well supported by the trial data — it is a reasonable clinical impression, but you should know the distinction.
Most treatments decline from a peak. PRP appears to do the opposite over the first six months — nothing measurable at 4 weeks, significant benefit at 12, sustained at 24.
That inverted curve is why judging the result early misleads, and why re-treating at six weeks intervenes before you know anything.
Because benefit appears to build to around 24 weeks and evidence beyond that is limited, repeat treatment is usually considered on the basis of how you are doing rather than a fixed schedule. See how many P-Shots you can have.
If you are weighing the ongoing cost against the evidence, our honest assessment is the page to read.
Reviewed by Daniel Moghadam, M.D.
Founder and medical director of Modern Aesthetica in Beverly Hills. Dr. Moghadam performs all injectable procedures personally. This article is educational and is not a substitute for a consultation — what is appropriate for you depends on examination.
Pooled trial data found significant improvement in erectile function at 12 and 24 weeks, with no significant difference from control at 4 weeks. Beyond 24 weeks the published follow-up is limited, so longer duration claims are clinical impression rather than measured evidence.
Probably not within the first month. The randomized trials found no significant difference from control at 4 weeks. Benefit appeared at 12 weeks and was sustained at 24. It stimulates a biological process rather than producing an immediate effect.
Not from the trial data, which mostly did not follow patients beyond six months. That figure is a reasonable clinical impression, but it is extrapolation rather than measurement, and you should know the difference.
Severity and cause of the dysfunction matter — mild to moderate cases respond better than severe. Advanced vascular disease, poorly controlled diabetes and nerve damage all limit what is achievable. PRP preparation quality also varies materially between clinics.
On the basis of how you are doing rather than a fixed calendar. Since benefit appears to build toward 24 weeks, we would generally reassess around then rather than re-treating early.
What to expect and when — based on what the trials actually measured.